Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Paul Stewart: Dual Penalty Shots Are Not Unprecedented
Author Message
Paul Stewart
Joined: 10.14.2013

Jan 3 @ 9:25 AM ET
Paul Stewart: Dual Penalty Shots Are Not Unprecedented
sleepy_floyd
Joined: 05.19.2010

Jan 3 @ 2:13 PM ET
What happens if he scores on the first penalty shot attempt? does that negate the 2nd penalty shot? If the player scored on immediately after being impeded, he wouldn't have still been awarded a penalty shot...

Bill Meltzer
Editor
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Joined: 07.13.2006

Jan 3 @ 5:13 PM ET
What happens if he scores on the first penalty shot attempt? does that negate the 2nd penalty shot? If the player scored on immediately after being impeded, he wouldn't have still been awarded a penalty shot...
- sleepy_floyd


The second infraction then becomes a two-minute penalty, I believe.
OrrFour
Joined: 11.04.2013

Jan 3 @ 6:18 PM ET
You gotta have brass cujones to make that call!

(I would have pretended to not see the second one!)
Wetbandit1
Vegas Golden Knights
Location: Unpopular opinion (i think): The best Die Hard movie is the 4th one- Live free or Die Hard -jdfitz7, NY
Joined: 10.07.2010

Jan 3 @ 10:02 PM ET
Paul Stewart: Dual Penalty Shots Are Not Unprecedented
- Paul Stewart


I thought of that speech as soon as I saw that called.
ChipArm
New Jersey Devils
Joined: 01.22.2008

Jan 5 @ 9:15 PM ET
Is it, or was it, common to take calls from front office personnel at the scorer's table?

Chip
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Jan 7 @ 12:51 AM ET
I would have never thought. Thanks. People will hate when I pull the "well actually,,,,"